Wednesday, 21 April 2010
BNP Election Broadcast 2010
If you care about your childrens and grandchildrens future Vote BNP on May 6th
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
Spot the British?
gordon brown said he believed voters were too "sensible" to fall for the BNP.
The Prime Minister hit out at the far-right party as "not British",
Can you spot the British in this photo put together from Bertie Bert ?
Monday, 12 April 2010
BNP Friends & media lies
Well I have looked and I have looked and I cant find a knuckle dragging skinhead thug among them?Take a closer look at www.thegreenarrow.co.uk
or visit Bertie Berts blog http://bertieberts.blogspot.com
Thankyou Bertie
Friday, 9 April 2010
Anti-BNP meeting cancelled,RMT caught out to be LIARS
A HIGHLY anticipated anti-BNP meeting starring a home-bred folk star, a sporting legend and a trade union leader had to be pulled at the last minute.
The Stop The BNP forum, which was organised by the RMT union, was scheduled to take place at the Broadway Theatre in Barking on Sunday (April 11) to discuss the implications of voting for the right-wing British National Party.
It promised to be a lively campaigning effort with the general secretary of RMT Bob Crow, Bard of Barking Billy Bragg and football star Luther Blissett as speakers.
However, the Broadway Theatre, which is a registered charity, had to cancel the meeting due to its political nature.
The venue had initially been told that the event would be a private meeting of union members but staff were surprised to see an advert from the RMT in this paper which announced it as an "open forum" with a political agenda.
A spokeswoman for the venue said: "The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) had hired the Broadway for an event that was to take place here on Sunday 11 April.
"At the time of the hire, the Broadway was informed that it was to be a private meeting for RMT members.
"Subsequently, we discovered that the event was being described as an 'open forum' in newspaper advertisements, with an agenda to discuss 'the dangerous consequences of further gains for the BNP in Barking and Dagenham'.
"Because the nature of the hire had been changed without discussion with or the prior agreement of the Broadway and was being advertised as a public event of a political nature, the Broadway was left with no option other than to cancel the event.
The Stop The BNP forum, which was organised by the RMT union, was scheduled to take place at the Broadway Theatre in Barking on Sunday (April 11) to discuss the implications of voting for the right-wing British National Party.
It promised to be a lively campaigning effort with the general secretary of RMT Bob Crow, Bard of Barking Billy Bragg and football star Luther Blissett as speakers.
However, the Broadway Theatre, which is a registered charity, had to cancel the meeting due to its political nature.
The venue had initially been told that the event would be a private meeting of union members but staff were surprised to see an advert from the RMT in this paper which announced it as an "open forum" with a political agenda.
A spokeswoman for the venue said: "The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) had hired the Broadway for an event that was to take place here on Sunday 11 April.
"At the time of the hire, the Broadway was informed that it was to be a private meeting for RMT members.
"Subsequently, we discovered that the event was being described as an 'open forum' in newspaper advertisements, with an agenda to discuss 'the dangerous consequences of further gains for the BNP in Barking and Dagenham'.
"Because the nature of the hire had been changed without discussion with or the prior agreement of the Broadway and was being advertised as a public event of a political nature, the Broadway was left with no option other than to cancel the event.
Thursday, 8 April 2010
browns betrayal of British workers
Immigration was at the centre of the election campaign today as it emerged that virtually every extra job created under Labour has gone to a foreign worker.
Figures suggested an extraordinary 98.5 per cent of 1.67million new posts were taken by immigrants.
Net inward migration to the UK, the difference between the number of people arriving and leaving, is up threefold since Labour came to power.
In 1997, it stood at 48,000. By 2004, fuelled by a surge in new arrivals from Eastern Europe, it reached an all-time record 244,000, and in 2007 it was 237,000
The BNP’s policy is to:
- Deport all the two million plus who are here illegally;
- Deport all those who commit crimes and whose original nationality was not British;
- Review all recent grants of residence or citizenship to ensure they are still appropriate;
- Offer generous grants to those of foreign descent resident here who wish to leave permanently;
- Stop all new immigration except for exceptional cases;
- Reject all asylum seekers who passed safe countries on their way to Britain.
Immigration is out of control. Britain’s population is now over 60 million and rising, solely due to immigration. Not only is Britain increasingly overcrowded, but the fact is that a country is the product of its people and if you change the people you inevitably change the nature of the country.
We want Britain to remain – or return to – the way it has traditionally been. We accept that Britain always will have ethnic minorities and have no problem with this as long as they remain minorities and do not change nor seek to change the fundamental culture and identity of the indigenous peoples of the British Isles.
The current open-door policy and unrestricted, uncontrolled immigration is leading to higher crime rates, demand for more housing (driving prices out of the reach of young people), severe extra strain on the environment, traffic congestion, longer hospital waiting lists, lower educational standards, higher income taxes, lower wages, higher unemployment, loss of British identity, a breakdown in community spirit, more restrictive policing, higher council taxes, a shortage of council homes, higher levels of stress and unhappiness and a more atomised society.
India would not tolerate millions of non-Indians taking over that society. Pakistan would not tolerate millions of Hindus or Christians entering that country and changing it from a Muslim society into something else. Japan would not do it; China would not do it – so why should Britain?
Can anyone imagine Saudi Arabia allowing the mass immigration of Christians, so that in a few decades it would no longer be an Islamic country?
Each nation has the right to maintain its own identity. The right of India to remain Indian, the right of China to remain Chinese, the right of Pakistan to remain Pakistani and the right of Saudi Arabia to remain Saudi does not mean that any of these nations “hate” anybody else.
All it means is that they wish to preserve their identity and national existence.
This is all the British National Party seeks for Britain – the right to be British.
This is not an extreme demand – it is actually just perfectly normal and completely in line with the rights granted to every other nation and with international law.
All the other parties shy away from this issue, because they are the ones who have caused the problem in the first place.
Only the British National Party has the reasonable, sensible, fair and just immigration policy which will guarantee that Britain remains British.
Figures suggested an extraordinary 98.5 per cent of 1.67million new posts were taken by immigrants.
Net inward migration to the UK, the difference between the number of people arriving and leaving, is up threefold since Labour came to power.
In 1997, it stood at 48,000. By 2004, fuelled by a surge in new arrivals from Eastern Europe, it reached an all-time record 244,000, and in 2007 it was 237,000
The BNP’s policy is to:
- Deport all the two million plus who are here illegally;
- Deport all those who commit crimes and whose original nationality was not British;
- Review all recent grants of residence or citizenship to ensure they are still appropriate;
- Offer generous grants to those of foreign descent resident here who wish to leave permanently;
- Stop all new immigration except for exceptional cases;
- Reject all asylum seekers who passed safe countries on their way to Britain.
Immigration is out of control. Britain’s population is now over 60 million and rising, solely due to immigration. Not only is Britain increasingly overcrowded, but the fact is that a country is the product of its people and if you change the people you inevitably change the nature of the country.
We want Britain to remain – or return to – the way it has traditionally been. We accept that Britain always will have ethnic minorities and have no problem with this as long as they remain minorities and do not change nor seek to change the fundamental culture and identity of the indigenous peoples of the British Isles.
The current open-door policy and unrestricted, uncontrolled immigration is leading to higher crime rates, demand for more housing (driving prices out of the reach of young people), severe extra strain on the environment, traffic congestion, longer hospital waiting lists, lower educational standards, higher income taxes, lower wages, higher unemployment, loss of British identity, a breakdown in community spirit, more restrictive policing, higher council taxes, a shortage of council homes, higher levels of stress and unhappiness and a more atomised society.
India would not tolerate millions of non-Indians taking over that society. Pakistan would not tolerate millions of Hindus or Christians entering that country and changing it from a Muslim society into something else. Japan would not do it; China would not do it – so why should Britain?
Can anyone imagine Saudi Arabia allowing the mass immigration of Christians, so that in a few decades it would no longer be an Islamic country?
Each nation has the right to maintain its own identity. The right of India to remain Indian, the right of China to remain Chinese, the right of Pakistan to remain Pakistani and the right of Saudi Arabia to remain Saudi does not mean that any of these nations “hate” anybody else.
All it means is that they wish to preserve their identity and national existence.
This is all the British National Party seeks for Britain – the right to be British.
This is not an extreme demand – it is actually just perfectly normal and completely in line with the rights granted to every other nation and with international law.
All the other parties shy away from this issue, because they are the ones who have caused the problem in the first place.
Only the British National Party has the reasonable, sensible, fair and just immigration policy which will guarantee that Britain remains British.
Monday, 15 February 2010
Announcement from the Black Country Patriots
Members of team Black Country BNP are soon to undertake a 1,100 foot walk up to Rodney's Pillar, on the Shropshire borders. Sponsors will be helping to fund the candidates for entry in to the campaign to potentially elect Members of Parliament to Westminster.
The last time this walk was completed, we were joined by Chairman Mr. Nick Griffin, and Deputy Chairman, Mr Simon Darby. We cannot promise that this will happen this time around, due to their massive commitments elsewhere, but who knows?
The team will walk up the 1,100 foot hill, and sponsors are required to help the campaign to get MP's elected, or give the enemies of our country a bloody good fright indeed, and prepare the way for future General Elections with a show of strength.
At 1 penny per foot, sponsors are able to help without breaking the bank. Some will want to go the whole hog, and sponsor every step. £11 will see the whole walk covered, but it is down to personal circumstances etc.
Anyone who wants to join the actual walk, contact Russ or John at rgreen13@btinternet.com or theunn@live.com
Sponsors please send cheques to Black Country British National Party, 131, Wattle Rd, West Bromwich. B70 9EX. Alternatively, fill in the credit/debit card forms that will be available to all members and supporters shorty upon request and via post/Internet.
Yours faithfully.
Team Black Country BNP admin.
** Please pass along and visit http://blackcountrybnp.blogspot.com/
Saturday, 6 February 2010
GM Motors & Bill Gates
GM Motors & Bill Gates
At a computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon".
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating:
If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:
1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.
4. Occasionally, executing a manoeuvre such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to re-install the engine.
5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, twice times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.
6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.
7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.
8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle,turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.
9. Every time a new car was introduced, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.
10.You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
At a computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon".
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating:
If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:
1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.
4. Occasionally, executing a manoeuvre such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to re-install the engine.
5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, twice times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.
6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.
7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.
8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle,turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.
9. Every time a new car was introduced, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.
10.You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
